1. Welcome Guest! In order to create a new topic or reply to an existing one, you must register first. It is easy and free. Click here to sign up now!.
    Dismiss Notice

vista entirely acting slow and choppy with everything i do!!

Discussion in 'Windows Vista' started by Malke, Jul 2, 2009.

  1. Malke

    Malke Guest

    bbj25 wrote:
    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    >
    > hey everyone!=) im new to this forum and im wondering if anyone can help
    > me with a problem i have.
    >
    > i recently *installed windows vista ultimate 32-bit* on a *ultra 320
    > scsi drive* and was acting *slow and every-time i would open anything no
    > matter what it is it would appear by shades *(like when recording a tv
    > or a computer screen with a digital camera)**. i was thinking it was the
    > drive so i installed it on a *IDE drive* (80 GB) and still acts the
    > same. if anyone can help i would appreciate this.
    >
    >
    > Specs:
    > Poweredge 1600sc Server
    > (2) Pentium 4 Xeon Processors
    > 1Gb of Ram
    > (2) Ultra 320 Scsi Drives
    > (1) IDE drive
    >
    > <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    Not enough RAM for Vista, really. You want at least 2GB. But I suspect it is
    a driver issue. There are no Vista drivers for that system. It isn't really
    suitable for Vista.



    Malke
    --
    MS-MVP
    Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
     
  2. bbj25

    bbj25 Guest

    hey everyone!=) im new to this forum and im wondering if anyone can help
    me with a problem i have.

    i recently *installed windows vista ultimate 32-bit* on a *ultra 320
    scsi drive* and was acting *slow and every-time i would open anything no
    matter what it is it would appear by shades *(like when recording a tv
    or a computer screen with a digital camera)**. i was thinking it was the
    drive so i installed it on a *IDE drive* (80 GB) and still acts the
    same. if anyone can help i would appreciate this.


    Specs:
    Poweredge 1600sc Server
    (2) Pentium 4 Xeon Processors
    1Gb of Ram
    (2) Ultra 320 Scsi Drives
    (1) IDE drive


    --
    bbj25
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    bbj25's Profile:
    View this thread:


     
  3. bbj25

    bbj25 Guest

    thanks guys, ill definitely buy more RAM and if the issue continues, ill
    post back.


    --
    bbj25
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    bbj25's Profile:
    View this thread:


     
  4. In article <OCqwLE4#JHA.3612@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>,
    Malke <malke@invalid.invalid> wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro--><!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >Not enough RAM for Vista, really. You want at least 2GB. But I suspect it is
    >a driver issue. There are no Vista drivers for that system. It isn't really
    >suitable for Vista.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    Lol, dual Xeons, 1GB and SCSI 320 and it's "not suitable" ???
     
  5. JEWboy

    JEWboy Guest

    You have to disable many things in Vista before it matches WinXP speed. I
    did and now happy with speed.
    I am not happy with a few issues, but speed is not one of them.

    I switched to Appearance--.Classic (no Aero idiocy), turned off UAC,
    Ethernet packet/ACK autotuning which instantly solves file copy problem over
    the network, I knocked WinExplorer to XP-like behavior, turned off Indexing
    services on all drier, off autoplay on all drives, disabled MANy services in
    Services console and MSCONFIG... too many things to list.

    So my speed as almost as good as WinXP.
    That Vista was meant for entertainment and not business is obvious, well we
    have to bear with it until Windows7....
     
  6. JEWboy

    JEWboy Guest

    Actually Malke was also right, I didn't notice.
    Vista by itself is a step backwards for Microsoft, comparing to good old
    WinXP

    But Malke is right about memory.
    Get 4GB memory, don't even bother with 2GB as prices have come down, I got
    high-end Corsairs two 2GB LAPTOP modules a total of 4GB for mere $50,
    desktop may cost even less.
    You can end up paying even $35 for no-name generic memory, but even Corsairs
    don't cost much. Besides Corsair, try QCZ, Micron, Kingston is a very
    common OEM supplier (but not for high-end).

    The worst is probably K-byte and PNY, cheap trash.
    Try mad ein America or at least Europe, Taiwanese are most abundant but I
    dont pick those, mine are made in Colorado, USA by Corsair (not ValueSelect
    which i smade in Taiwan).

    OK to make this rant short:
    Get 4GB memory.
     
  7. Malke

    Malke Guest

    the wharf rat wrote:
    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > In article <OCqwLE4#JHA.3612@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>,
    > Malke <malke@invalid.invalid> wrote:<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro--><!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
    >>> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >>Not enough RAM for Vista, really. You want at least 2GB. But I suspect it
    >>is a driver issue. There are no Vista drivers for that system. It isn't
    >>really suitable for Vista.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > Lol, dual Xeons, 1GB and SCSI 320 and it's "not suitable" ???<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    That's right and no LOL about it. Drivers, drivers, drivers. You can have
    the best hardware in the world but if there are no drivers for the
    operating system you want to run the box won't work right.

    Unless you can write your own drivers. LOL.

    Malke
    --
    MS-MVP
    Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
     

Share This Page