Very slow home network access, explorer freezes

I've got the following system setup:

Dell Studio Laptop running Windows Vista Home Premium.
Home wired & wireless network with Wireless N D-Link router, Netgear
ReadyNAS duo wired to router, PS3 game console connected to router. I
only use wireless from my laptop.

When I try to move files around on the NAS using windows explorer, I
can't seem to browse the NAS' content for more than a few minutes, then
explorer locks up or enters a mode where it keeps refreshing the view of
the network directory and doesn't allow basic file operations like
right-clicking on a file to get its properties.

I can't get more than 1 Mbps of transfer speed with Robocopy out of the
NAS. I have some video files on the NAS unit. Double clicking on any
video to play it in Media Player is the worst thing to do - WMP doesn't
manage to download enough data to buffer it and never allows to be shut
down. I prevents Windows from shutting down cleanly.

I made sure I had the latest drivers for the wireless adapter.

Any help on how to troubleshoot this issue is appreciated.


--
ernhamDjinn
Posted via

 

It is a fact of Vista life that wireless connections to a router are
inherently unstable depending on the combination of hardware involved.
I have one Vista 64 laptop wirelessly connected to the router that
periodically behaves as you describe. The only fix I have found is to reset
the router by unplugging/replugging. However other Vista and XP laptops are
working fine with their wireless connections even though the one Vista
laptop cannot stably connect.
While NAS is a great concept the reality is often what you describe and
worse with Vista than XP. Unless you have to use NAS a USB/ESATA drive
connected directly to your laptop will actually work like it is supposed to.
Regardless of OS streaming high bandwidth video over wireless network
connections is usually inadequate. There are several proprietary solutions
for getting high bandwidth video from computer to HD monitor but you would
have to look up reviews to see if any actually work as advertised.
Finally: what is the strength of your wireless connection?

 

Thanks a lot for your reply. I have found that my situation is quite
common among vista users. Other NAS devices seem to work a little better
- I never had that many problems with a Buffalo NAS, but the unit didn't
any help to die, so I bought ReadyNAS since coworkers recommended that.
None of them run Vista so obviously they don't have that problem.

I am not that disappointed in the setup because once the files are
correctly arranged on the NAS, it streams really fast to the PS3
connected on the same network and I can view my videos (not DVD quality,
though) without dropping a frame. I'm not really looking for a system
that streams HD video to my TV, these systems usually cost a lot (I've
done research on that topic) but simple video/music/photo streaming is
good enough. Not needing my laptop to be on is definitely a bonus, not
to mention my media files are safe on a unit that has a replication
factor of 2 and don't clutter my hard drive. The only weak link is
Vista, and maybe I'd benefit from a 64-bit build.

To answer your question about the wireless link, the signal is as
strong as it can be - the router I'm connected to is a D-Link Wireless
N. The router the NAS is connected to is a LinkSys WRT54G, both routers
are connected to the main router which acts as my DHCP server (DHCP
disabled on both other routers, for obvious reasons). Maybe I'd benefit
from a higher quality router than the WRT54G, but I wouldn't expect
wonders. At some point I thought I would upgrade all routers to Gigabit
ethernet, but I'm far from saturating the 100Mbps link (only maybe 8Mbps
in the best case from the NAS to my Vista machine, far from the
theoretical limit of Wireless N).

Any scoop on the next version of Windows (Windows 7) and how it
compares to Vista on networking ?


--
ernhamDjinn
Posted via

 

ernhamDjinn wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Thanks a lot for your reply. I have found that my situation is quite
> common among vista users. Other NAS devices seem to work a little better
> - I never had that many problems with a Buffalo NAS, but the unit didn't
> any help to die, so I bought ReadyNAS since coworkers recommended that.
> None of them run Vista so obviously they don't have that problem.
>
> I am not that disappointed in the setup because once the files are
> correctly arranged on the NAS, it streams really fast to the PS3
> connected on the same network and I can view my videos (not DVD quality,
> though) without dropping a frame. I'm not really looking for a system
> that streams HD video to my TV, these systems usually cost a lot (I've
> done research on that topic) but simple video/music/photo streaming is
> good enough. Not needing my laptop to be on is definitely a bonus, not
> to mention my media files are safe on a unit that has a replication
> factor of 2 and don't clutter my hard drive. The only weak link is
> Vista, and maybe I'd benefit from a 64-bit build.
>
> To answer your question about the wireless link, the signal is as
> strong as it can be - the router I'm connected to is a D-Link Wireless
> N. The router the NAS is connected to is a LinkSys WRT54G, both routers
> are connected to the main router which acts as my DHCP server (DHCP
> disabled on both other routers, for obvious reasons). Maybe I'd benefit
> from a higher quality router than the WRT54G, but I wouldn't expect
> wonders. At some point I thought I would upgrade all routers to Gigabit
> ethernet, but I'm far from saturating the 100Mbps link (only maybe 8Mbps
> in the best case from the NAS to my Vista machine, far from the
> theoretical limit of Wireless N).
>
> Any scoop on the next version of Windows (Windows 7) and how it
> compares to Vista on networking ?
>
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

I have a WRT5G that occasionally gives a real slow connection to a wired
machine yet at the same time works perfectly on wireless, so the simple
answer is to reset the WRT...

I have no idea why this happens, only that it has done so a couple of
times, apparently at random.

Nothing had changed in the network, the one wired machine simply got
really slow. Hasn't happened again for months.

 

I admit I did not follow the comments closely, but I wanted to let you
know that I ran into the ReadyNAS - Vista slowness issue where a copy
that would take seconds in XP would take hours on Vista. The issue is
that Vista has a DNS bug that occassionally comes up with primarily
Samba. The fix is to map to the IP Address instead of the DNS name of
your ReadyNAS. When I did that, a file copy that took all night would
be done in 5 minutes - so dramatic, to put it mildly.

Best of luck.

--Monty

Charlie Tame;1256607 Wrote: <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> ernhamDjinn wrote:<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > Thanks a lot for your reply. I have found that my situation is quite
> > common among vista users. Other NAS devices seem to work a little<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> better<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > - I never had that many problems with a Buffalo NAS, but the unit<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> didn't<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > any help to die, so I bought ReadyNAS since coworkers recommended<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> that.<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > None of them run Vista so obviously they don't have that problem.
> >
> > I am not that disappointed in the setup because once the files are
> > correctly arranged on the NAS, it streams really fast to the PS3
> > connected on the same network and I can view my videos (not DVD<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> quality,<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > though) without dropping a frame. I'm not really looking for a system
> > that streams HD video to my TV, these systems usually cost a lot<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> (I've<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > done research on that topic) but simple video/music/photo streaming<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> is<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > good enough. Not needing my laptop to be on is definitely a bonus,<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> not<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > to mention my media files are safe on a unit that has a replication
> > factor of 2 and don't clutter my hard drive. The only weak link is
> > Vista, and maybe I'd benefit from a 64-bit build.
> >
> > To answer your question about the wireless link, the signal is as
> > strong as it can be - the router I'm connected to is a D-Link<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> Wireless<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > N. The router the NAS is connected to is a LinkSys WRT54G, both<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> routers<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > are connected to the main router which acts as my DHCP server (DHCP
> > disabled on both other routers, for obvious reasons). Maybe I'd<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> benefit<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > from a higher quality router than the WRT54G, but I wouldn't expect
> > wonders. At some point I thought I would upgrade all routers to<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> Gigabit<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > ethernet, but I'm far from saturating the 100Mbps link (only maybe<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> 8Mbps<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > in the best case from the NAS to my Vista machine, far from the
> > theoretical limit of Wireless N).
> >
> > Any scoop on the next version of Windows (Windows 7) and how it
> > compares to Vista on networking ?
> >
> ><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
>
> I have a WRT5G that occasionally gives a real slow connection to a
> wired
> machine yet at the same time works perfectly on wireless, so the simple
> answer is to reset the WRT...
>
> I have no idea why this happens, only that it has done so a couple of
> times, apparently at random.
>
> Nothing had changed in the network, the one wired machine simply got
> really slow. Hasn't happened again for months.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->


--
Monty0000
Posted via