1. Welcome Guest! In order to create a new topic or reply to an existing one, you must register first. It is easy and free. Click here to sign up now!.
    Dismiss Notice

Skirmish with .NET Framework versions 2.0, 3.0, 3.5 following update to SP1

Discussion in 'Windows Vista' started by Doug, Jun 18, 2009.

  1. Doug

    Doug Guest

    System: Conventional PC with 4GB RAM, no swap file, Vista Home Premium with
    all updates including SP1.

    I am trying to run FxVisor32.msi (Vista Shortcut Overlay Remover from
    ) which installed normally but when run reports:
    Unhandled exception error has occurred in your application. If you click
    Continue, the application will ignore this error and attempt to continue. If
    you click Quit, the application will close immediately.

    The detailed report is appended. It will be seen that .NET\Framework\v2.0 is
    involved. When I skip the message the program runs but a similar warning
    (not shown here) is repeated with nothing achieved.

    This incident follows a skirmish fought on my system between .NET Framework
    3.5 and .NET Framework 3.0 following the installation of Nero 9.0.9.4 and
    Nuance OmniPage 17 during which I ended up with both .NET 3.5 and 3.0
    installed, as neither package would install with 3.5 alone..

    I am wondering whether I now also need to install .NET Framework 2.0.
    Ideally I suppose I am seeking a .NET environment that will cope with
    everything that is thrown at it. Is it OK to have multiple versions of .NET
    installed concurrently?

    Perhaps I should just backup and then edit the icon overlay? Where would
    that be? (I have icon editor IcoFX 1.6.4).

    Doug


    ======== Appendix Starts =========
    See the end of this message for details on invoking
    just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.

    ************** Exception Text **************
    System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: Configuration system
    failed to initialize ---> System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException:
    Unrecognized configuration section system.serviceModel.
    (C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Config\machine.config line
    146)
    at System.Configuration.ConfigurationSchemaErrors.ThrowIfErrors(Boolean
    ignoreLocal)
    at
    System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.ThrowIfParseErrors(ConfigurationSchemaErrors
    schemaErrors)
    at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.ThrowIfInitErrors()
    at System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.EnsureInit(String
    configKey)
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    at System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.EnsureInit(String
    configKey)
    at
    System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.PrepareClientConfigSystem(String
    sectionName)
    at
    System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.System.Configuration.Internal.IInternalConfigSystem.RefreshConfig(String
    sectionName)
    at System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.RefreshSection(String
    sectionName)
    at System.Configuration.ClientSettingsStore.ReadSettings(String
    sectionName, Boolean isUserScoped)
    at
    System.Configuration.LocalFileSettingsProvider.GetPropertyValues(SettingsContext
    context, SettingsPropertyCollection properties)
    at
    System.Configuration.SettingsBase.GetPropertiesFromProvider(SettingsProvider
    provider)
    at System.Configuration.SettingsBase.GetPropertyValueByName(String
    propertyName)
    at System.Configuration.SettingsBase.get_Item(String propertyName)
    at System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsBase.GetPropertyValue(String
    propertyName)
    at System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsBase.get_Item(String
    propertyName)
    at VistaArrowGone.Properties.Settings.get_Arrow()
    at VistaArrowGone.Form1.Form1_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
    at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e)
    at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnCreateControl()
    at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible)
    at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl()
    at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m)
    at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
    at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
    at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m)
    at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WmShowWindow(Message& m)
    at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WndProc(Message& m)
    at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
    at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
    at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg,
    IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)


    ************** Loaded Assemblies **************
    mscorlib
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    CodeBase:
    file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll
    ----------------------------------------
    FxVisor
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.0.0
    CodeBase:
    file:///C:/Program%20Files/Frameworkx/Vista%20Shortcut%20Manager/FxVisor.exe
    ----------------------------------------
    System.Windows.Forms
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    CodeBase:
    file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
    ----------------------------------------
    System
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    CodeBase:
    file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
    ----------------------------------------
    System.Drawing
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    CodeBase:
    file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
    ----------------------------------------
    System.Configuration
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    CodeBase:
    file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll
    ----------------------------------------
    System.Xml
    Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    CodeBase:
    file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
    ----------------------------------------

    ************** JIT Debugging **************
    To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this
    application or computer (machine.config) must have the
    jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
    The application must also be compiled with debugging
    enabled.

    For example:

    <configuration>
    <system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />
    </configuration>

    When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception
    will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer
    rather than be handled by this dialog box.
    ========= Appendix Ends ==========



    __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4166 (20090618) __________

    The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

     
  2. DL

    DL Guest

    Run MS Update, install any Net framework offered, yes you need multiple
    versions as an app may be version specific
    No swap file?

    "Doug" <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote in message
    news:%23zVjLaA8JHA.3700@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > System: Conventional PC with 4GB RAM, no swap file, Vista Home Premium
    > with all updates including SP1.
    >
    > I am trying to run FxVisor32.msi (Vista Shortcut Overlay Remover from
    > ) which installed normally but when run reports:
    > Unhandled exception error has occurred in your application. If you click
    > Continue, the application will ignore this error and attempt to continue.
    > If you click Quit, the application will close immediately.
    >
    > The detailed report is appended. It will be seen that .NETFrameworkv2.0
    > is involved. When I skip the message the program runs but a similar
    > warning (not shown here) is repeated with nothing achieved.
    >
    > This incident follows a skirmish fought on my system between .NET
    > Framework 3.5 and .NET Framework 3.0 following the installation of Nero
    > 9.0.9.4 and Nuance OmniPage 17 during which I ended up with both .NET 3.5
    > and 3.0 installed, as neither package would install with 3.5 alone..
    >
    > I am wondering whether I now also need to install .NET Framework 2.0.
    > Ideally I suppose I am seeking a .NET environment that will cope with
    > everything that is thrown at it. Is it OK to have multiple versions of
    > .NET installed concurrently?
    >
    > Perhaps I should just backup and then edit the icon overlay? Where would
    > that be? (I have icon editor IcoFX 1.6.4).
    >
    > Doug
    >
    >
    > ======== Appendix Starts =========
    > See the end of this message for details on invoking
    > just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.
    >
    > ************** Exception Text **************
    > System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: Configuration system
    > failed to initialize --->
    > System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: Unrecognized
    > configuration section system.serviceModel.
    > (C:WindowsMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Configmachine.config line
    > 146)
    > at System.Configuration.ConfigurationSchemaErrors.ThrowIfErrors(Boolean
    > ignoreLocal)
    > at
    > System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.ThrowIfParseErrors(ConfigurationSchemaErrors
    > schemaErrors)
    > at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.ThrowIfInitErrors()
    > at System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.EnsureInit(String
    > configKey)
    > --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    > at System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.EnsureInit(String
    > configKey)
    > at
    > System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.PrepareClientConfigSystem(String
    > sectionName)
    > at
    > System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.System.Configuration.Internal.IInternalConfigSystem.RefreshConfig(String
    > sectionName)
    > at System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.RefreshSection(String
    > sectionName)
    > at System.Configuration.ClientSettingsStore.ReadSettings(String
    > sectionName, Boolean isUserScoped)
    > at
    > System.Configuration.LocalFileSettingsProvider.GetPropertyValues(SettingsContext
    > context, SettingsPropertyCollection properties)
    > at
    > System.Configuration.SettingsBase.GetPropertiesFromProvider(SettingsProvider
    > provider)
    > at System.Configuration.SettingsBase.GetPropertyValueByName(String
    > propertyName)
    > at System.Configuration.SettingsBase.get_Item(String propertyName)
    > at System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsBase.GetPropertyValue(String
    > propertyName)
    > at System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsBase.get_Item(String
    > propertyName)
    > at VistaArrowGone.Properties.Settings.get_Arrow()
    > at VistaArrowGone.Form1.Form1_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnCreateControl()
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl()
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WmShowWindow(Message& m)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WndProc(Message& m)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message&
    > m)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
    > at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg,
    > IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)
    >
    >
    > ************** Loaded Assemblies **************
    > mscorlib
    > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    > CodeBase:
    > file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll
    > ----------------------------------------
    > FxVisor
    > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    > Win32 Version: 2.0.0.0
    > CodeBase:
    > file:///C:/Program%20Files/Frameworkx/Vista%20Shortcut%20Manager/FxVisor.exe
    > ----------------------------------------
    > System.Windows.Forms
    > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    > CodeBase:
    > file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
    > ----------------------------------------
    > System
    > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    > CodeBase:
    > file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
    > ----------------------------------------
    > System.Drawing
    > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    > CodeBase:
    > file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
    > ----------------------------------------
    > System.Configuration
    > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    > CodeBase:
    > file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll
    > ----------------------------------------
    > System.Xml
    > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    > CodeBase:
    > file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
    > ----------------------------------------
    >
    > ************** JIT Debugging **************
    > To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this
    > application or computer (machine.config) must have the
    > jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
    > The application must also be compiled with debugging
    > enabled.
    >
    > For example:
    >
    > <configuration>
    > <system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />
    > </configuration>
    >
    > When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception
    > will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer
    > rather than be handled by this dialog box.
    > ========= Appendix Ends ==========
    >
    >
    >
    > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
    > signature database 4166 (20090618) __________
    >
    > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
    >
    >

    >
    >
    > <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
     
  3. "JEWboy" <Nojunkmetalblade@nojunkprodigy.net> wrote in message
    news:OrhTBBC8JHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > no swap file due to 4GB this guy thought it's OK, but I dont think. I
    > think he needs a swap file<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    You are 100% right. You don't think.

    IDIOT
     
  4. Mike

    Mike Guest

    "JEWboy" <Nojunkmetalblade@nojunkprodigy.net> wrote in message
    news:OrhTBBC8JHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
    < but I dont think.

    We know, dammit! We know!
    --

    Don't pick a fight with an old man.
    If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.
     
  5. JEWboy

    JEWboy Guest

    no swap file due to 4GB this guy thought it's OK, but I dont think. I think
    he needs a swap file
     
  6. Doug

    Doug Guest

    Thanks, DL, for explaining that it is normal to run multiple versions of
    ..NET.

    No swap file? - I only mentioned it in case it might affect the .NET issue.

    Off topic, when I took my box in to the manufacturer to have an extra 2GB
    fitted to make 4GB, I was surprised when I got it home to find the
    technician had removed the swap file. After trying it with a fixed swap file
    of around 9GB and reading up about it, I decided that opinion was evenly
    divided and that he was probably right. The space is welcome, the disc
    thrashing reduced, everything seems faster, and PerfectDisk has less
    defragging to do.

    Doug

    "DL" <notvalid@spoofaddress.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:e7JwBCB8JHA.5828@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > Run MS Update, install any Net framework offered, yes you need multiple
    > versions as an app may be version specific
    > No swap file?
    >
    > "Doug" <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote in message
    > news:%23zVjLaA8JHA.3700@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> System: Conventional PC with 4GB RAM, no swap file, Vista Home Premium
    >> with all updates including SP1.
    >>
    >> I am trying to run FxVisor32.msi (Vista Shortcut Overlay Remover from
    >> ) which installed normally but when run reports:
    >> Unhandled exception error has occurred in your application. If you click
    >> Continue, the application will ignore this error and attempt to continue.
    >> If you click Quit, the application will close immediately.
    >>
    >> The detailed report is appended. It will be seen that .NETFrameworkv2.0
    >> is involved. When I skip the message the program runs but a similar
    >> warning (not shown here) is repeated with nothing achieved.
    >>
    >> This incident follows a skirmish fought on my system between .NET
    >> Framework 3.5 and .NET Framework 3.0 following the installation of Nero
    >> 9.0.9.4 and Nuance OmniPage 17 during which I ended up with both .NET 3.5
    >> and 3.0 installed, as neither package would install with 3.5 alone..
    >>
    >> I am wondering whether I now also need to install .NET Framework 2.0.
    >> Ideally I suppose I am seeking a .NET environment that will cope with
    >> everything that is thrown at it. Is it OK to have multiple versions of
    >> .NET installed concurrently?
    >>
    >> Perhaps I should just backup and then edit the icon overlay? Where would
    >> that be? (I have icon editor IcoFX 1.6.4).
    >>
    >> Doug
    >>
    >>
    >> ======== Appendix Starts =========
    >> See the end of this message for details on invoking
    >> just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.
    >>
    >> ************** Exception Text **************
    >> System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: Configuration system
    >> failed to initialize --->
    >> System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: Unrecognized
    >> configuration section system.serviceModel.
    >> (C:WindowsMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Configmachine.config line
    >> 146)
    >> at System.Configuration.ConfigurationSchemaErrors.ThrowIfErrors(Boolean
    >> ignoreLocal)
    >> at
    >> System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.ThrowIfParseErrors(ConfigurationSchemaErrors
    >> schemaErrors)
    >> at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.ThrowIfInitErrors()
    >> at System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.EnsureInit(String
    >> configKey)
    >> --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    >> at System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.EnsureInit(String
    >> configKey)
    >> at
    >> System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.PrepareClientConfigSystem(String
    >> sectionName)
    >> at
    >> System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.System.Configuration.Internal.IInternalConfigSystem.RefreshConfig(String
    >> sectionName)
    >> at System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.RefreshSection(String
    >> sectionName)
    >> at System.Configuration.ClientSettingsStore.ReadSettings(String
    >> sectionName, Boolean isUserScoped)
    >> at
    >> System.Configuration.LocalFileSettingsProvider.GetPropertyValues(SettingsContext
    >> context, SettingsPropertyCollection properties)
    >> at
    >> System.Configuration.SettingsBase.GetPropertiesFromProvider(SettingsProvider
    >> provider)
    >> at System.Configuration.SettingsBase.GetPropertyValueByName(String
    >> propertyName)
    >> at System.Configuration.SettingsBase.get_Item(String propertyName)
    >> at System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsBase.GetPropertyValue(String
    >> propertyName)
    >> at System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsBase.get_Item(String
    >> propertyName)
    >> at VistaArrowGone.Properties.Settings.get_Arrow()
    >> at VistaArrowGone.Form1.Form1_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnCreateControl()
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl()
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WmShowWindow(Message& m)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WndProc(Message& m)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message&
    >> m)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
    >> at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg,
    >> IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)
    >>
    >>
    >> ************** Loaded Assemblies **************
    >> mscorlib
    >> Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    >> Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    >> CodeBase:
    >> file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll
    >> ----------------------------------------
    >> FxVisor
    >> Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    >> Win32 Version: 2.0.0.0
    >> CodeBase:
    >> file:///C:/Program%20Files/Frameworkx/Vista%20Shortcut%20Manager/FxVisor.exe
    >> ----------------------------------------
    >> System.Windows.Forms
    >> Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    >> Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    >> CodeBase:
    >> file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
    >> ----------------------------------------
    >> System
    >> Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    >> Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    >> CodeBase:
    >> file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
    >> ----------------------------------------
    >> System.Drawing
    >> Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    >> Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    >> CodeBase:
    >> file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
    >> ----------------------------------------
    >> System.Configuration
    >> Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    >> Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    >> CodeBase:
    >> file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll
    >> ----------------------------------------
    >> System.Xml
    >> Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
    >> Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4016 (NetFxQFE.050727-4000)
    >> CodeBase:
    >> file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
    >> ----------------------------------------
    >>
    >> ************** JIT Debugging **************
    >> To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this
    >> application or computer (machine.config) must have the
    >> jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
    >> The application must also be compiled with debugging
    >> enabled.
    >>
    >> For example:
    >>
    >> <configuration>
    >> <system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />
    >> </configuration>
    >>
    >> When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception
    >> will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer
    >> rather than be handled by this dialog box.
    >> ========= Appendix Ends ==========<!--colorc--><!--/colorc--><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->


    __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4168 (20090618) __________

    The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

     
  7. On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:00:36 +0100, "Doug"
    <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote:

    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > Off topic, when I took my box in to the manufacturer to have an extra 2GB
    > fitted to make 4GB, I was surprised when I got it home to find the
    > technician had removed the swap file. After trying it with a fixed swap file
    > of around 9GB and reading up about it, I decided that opinion was evenly
    > divided and that he was probably right. <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->



    He was not right.

    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > The space is welcome, the disc
    > thrashing reduced, everything seems faster, and PerfectDisk has less
    > defragging to do.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->


    There's no reason to have a fixed size. There's no advantage to not
    having a page file, and often a disadvantage.

    1. If you don't have a page file, you can't use all the RAM you have.
    That's because Windows preallocates virtual memory in anticipation of
    a possible need for it, even though that allocated virtual memory may
    never be used. Without a page file, that allocation has to be made in
    real memory, thus tying up that memory and preventing it from being
    used for any purpose.

    2. There is never a benefit in not having a page file. If it isn't
    needed, it won't be used. Don't confuse allocated memory with used
    memory.

    --
    Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
    Please Reply to the Newsgroup
     
  8. Doug

    Doug Guest

    "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
    news:s95l351bogq2d89t2u2gj0eocmn67b1v1l@4ax.com...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:00:36 +0100, "Doug"
    > <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote:
    ><!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> Off topic, when I took my box in to the manufacturer to have an extra 2GB
    >> fitted to make 4GB, I was surprised when I got it home to find the
    >> technician had removed the swap file. After trying it with a fixed swap
    >> file
    >> of around 9GB and reading up about it, I decided that opinion was evenly
    >> divided and that he was probably right.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > He was not right.
    ><!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> The space is welcome, the disc
    >> thrashing reduced, everything seems faster, and PerfectDisk has less
    >> defragging to do.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > There's no reason to have a fixed size. There's no advantage to not
    > having a page file, and often a disadvantage.
    >
    > 1. If you don't have a page file, you can't use all the RAM you have.
    > That's because Windows preallocates virtual memory in anticipation of
    > a possible need for it, even though that allocated virtual memory may
    > never be used. Without a page file, that allocation has to be made in
    > real memory, thus tying up that memory and preventing it from being
    > used for any purpose.
    >
    > 2. There is never a benefit in not having a page file. If it isn't
    > needed, it won't be used. Don't confuse allocated memory with used
    > memory.
    > --
    > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
    > Please Reply to the Newsgroup<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    Thanks, Ken, I shall certainly give this further attention.
    Doug


    __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4169 (20090619) __________

    The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

     
  9. On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:19:19 +0100, "Doug"
    <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote:
    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
    > news:s95l351bogq2d89t2u2gj0eocmn67b1v1l@4ax.com...<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:00:36 +0100, "Doug"
    > > <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote:
    > ><!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
    > >> Off topic, when I took my box in to the manufacturer to have an extra 2GB
    > >> fitted to make 4GB, I was surprised when I got it home to find the
    > >> technician had removed the swap file. After trying it with a fixed swap
    > >> file
    > >> of around 9GB and reading up about it, I decided that opinion was evenly
    > >> divided and that he was probably right.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    > >
    > > He was not right.
    > ><!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
    > >> The space is welcome, the disc
    > >> thrashing reduced, everything seems faster, and PerfectDisk has less
    > >> defragging to do.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    > >
    > > There's no reason to have a fixed size. There's no advantage to not
    > > having a page file, and often a disadvantage.
    > >
    > > 1. If you don't have a page file, you can't use all the RAM you have.
    > > That's because Windows preallocates virtual memory in anticipation of
    > > a possible need for it, even though that allocated virtual memory may
    > > never be used. Without a page file, that allocation has to be made in
    > > real memory, thus tying up that memory and preventing it from being
    > > used for any purpose.
    > >
    > > 2. There is never a benefit in not having a page file. If it isn't
    > > needed, it won't be used. Don't confuse allocated memory with used
    > > memory.
    > > --
    > > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
    > > Please Reply to the Newsgroup<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > Thanks, Ken, I shall certainly give this further attention.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->


    You're welcome. Glad to help.

    --
    Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
    Please Reply to the Newsgroup
     

Share This Page