1. Welcome Guest! In order to create a new topic or reply to an existing one, you must register first. It is easy and free. Click here to sign up now!.
    Dismiss Notice

Re: The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows7!

Discussion in 'Windows Vista' started by Muad'Dib, Sep 3, 2009.

  1. Muad'Dib

    Muad'Dib Guest

    kevpan815 wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
    you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing up your claim? All I see
    is an unfounded statement to be ignored.

    In MY and MANY others testing, Win 7 is/will be MUCH better than Vista
    right out-of-the-box. ..Leaner, meaner, faster. Go install and uninstall
    some more OS's and quit spreading moronic crap. ..Hell, you don't leave
    ANYTHING installed long enough to FULLY test it, yet you spew your
    constant meaningless, moronic, reports.

    Get a life.

    G'day
     
  2. Re: The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!



    "Muad'Dib" <idaspud52@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:4A9F83FE.5060708@nospamhotmail.com...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > kevpan815 wrote:<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
    > you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing your claim? All I see is an
    > unfounded statement to be ignored.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    FYI

    Check out the link below to view available toys that can be used in the new
    Windows 7.





    For Your Information, that was FYI.
     
  3. Alias

    Alias Guest

    kevpan851@gmail.com wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    >
    >
    > "Muad'Dib" <idaspud52@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:4A9F83FE.5060708@nospamhotmail.com...<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> kevpan815 wrote:<!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
    >>> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >>
    >> Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information
    >> do you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing your claim? All I
    >> see is an unfounded statement to be ignored.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > FYI
    >
    > Check out the link below to view available toys that can be used in the new
    > Windows 7.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > For Your Information, that was FYI.
    >
    >
    > <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    Your home page, nymshifter?

    Alias
     
  4. +Bob+

    +Bob+ Guest

    Re: The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!

    On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:53:18 -0600, Muad'Dib
    <idaspud52@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:
    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    >kevpan815 wrote:<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
    >you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing up your claim? All I see
    >is an unfounded statement to be ignored.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    Perhaps he's used a new Windows release before? Anyone who maintains
    MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.

    Of course, if you want to consider Win7 as Visa SP3, then maybe it's
    OK to use.
     
  5. Mr.Pancks

    Mr.Pancks Guest

    Re: The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!


    "+Bob+" <nomailplease@example.com> wrote in message
    news:htu5a5t6umfbt11mv12ep8ba0us3ooapcf@4ax.com...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    >
    > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:53:18 -0600, Muad'Dib
    > <idaspud52@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:
    ><!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >>kevpan815 wrote:<!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
    >>> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >>
    >> Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
    >>you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing up your claim? All I see
    >>is an unfounded statement to be ignored.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > Perhaps he's used a new Windows release before? Anyone who maintains
    > MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
    >
    > Of course, if you want to consider Win7 as Visa SP3, then maybe it's
    > OK to use.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    Its sp3 with KDE added.

    But it does smoke Vista.

    MS users hate linux, but MS developers have found linux quite useful.

    If only they knew!
     
  6. Muad'Dib

    Muad'Dib Guest

    +Bob+ wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:53:18 -0600, Muad'Dib
    > <idaspud52@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:
    > <!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> kevpan815 wrote:<!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
    >>> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >> Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
    >> you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing up your claim? All I see
    >> is an unfounded statement to be ignored.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > Perhaps he's used a new Windows release before? Anyone who maintains
    > MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
    >
    > Of course, if you want to consider Win7 as Visa SP3, then maybe it's
    > OK to use. <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    In my testing, (Beta and now RC), Both Beta and RC smokes Vista in every
    way, including STABILITY. Naturally, anyones MMV.

    G'day
     
  7. +Bob+ wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    >
    >
    > Perhaps he's used a new Windows release before? <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->


    Unlikely.

    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > Anyone who maintains
    > MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
    > <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    That is completely untrue. Granted, a few incompetents always advise
    that, but that's a far cry form "Anyone who maintains MS-Windows
    professionally...." From my point of view, only the most unprofessional
    blame the OS for their own lack of preparedness.


    --

    Bruce Chambers

    Help us help you:




    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

    Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

    The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
    killed a great many philosophers.
    ~ Denis Diderot
     
  8. +Bob+

    +Bob+ Guest

    Re: The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!

    On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:30:56 -0600, Bruce Chambers
    <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote:
    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    ><!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> Anyone who maintains
    >> MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
    >> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > That is completely untrue. Granted, a few incompetents always advise
    >that, but that's a far cry form "Anyone who maintains MS-Windows
    >professionally...." From my point of view, only the most unprofessional
    >blame the OS for their own lack of preparedness.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    You're the incompetent if you upgrade business customers to a new
    version of windows before SP1. Every recent Windows release - Vista,
    XP, Win2K - was known for being unusable before SP1. In addition,
    there hasn't been a single MS OS that hasn't run appreciably better
    after SP1.

    You'd better go back to your Mom and Pop shops now and do your
    upgrades. Mom and Pop won't notice how bad it sucks.
     
  9. Mr.Pancks

    Mr.Pancks Guest

    Re: The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!

    +Bob+ wrote:
    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:30:56 -0600, Bruce Chambers
    > <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote:
    > <!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >><!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
    >>> Anyone who maintains
    >>> MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
    >>> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >>
    >>That is completely untrue. Granted, a few incompetents always advise
    >>that, but that's a far cry form "Anyone who maintains MS-Windows
    >>professionally...." From my point of view, only the most unprofessional
    >>blame the OS for their own lack of preparedness.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    > You're the incompetent if you upgrade business customers to a new
    > version of windows before SP1. Every recent Windows release - Vista,
    > XP, Win2K - was known for being unusable before SP1. In addition,
    > there hasn't been a single MS OS that hasn't run appreciably better
    > after SP1.
    >
    > You'd better go back to your Mom and Pop shops now and do your
    > upgrades. Mom and Pop won't notice how bad it sucks.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    Vista sp2 was a downgrade.
    ****in right clicking the desktop takes 7 seconds for a window to show up.
    Friggen disgusting that a Windows OS behaves that way.

    I'd fire the lot of them.

    Disgraceful...POS
     
  10. +Bob+

    +Bob+ Guest

    Re: The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!

    On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:18:12 -0400, "Mr.Pancks"
    <pancks@bleedingheart.yard> wrote:
    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    >+Bob+ wrote:
    ><!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
    >> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:30:56 -0600, Bruce Chambers
    >> <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote:
    >> <!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
    >>>
    >>>> Anyone who maintains
    >>>> MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>That is completely untrue. Granted, a few incompetents always advise
    >>>that, but that's a far cry form "Anyone who maintains MS-Windows
    >>>professionally...." From my point of view, only the most unprofessional
    >>>blame the OS for their own lack of preparedness.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >>
    >> You're the incompetent if you upgrade business customers to a new
    >> version of windows before SP1. Every recent Windows release - Vista,
    >> XP, Win2K - was known for being unusable before SP1. In addition,
    >> there hasn't been a single MS OS that hasn't run appreciably better
    >> after SP1.
    >>
    >> You'd better go back to your Mom and Pop shops now and do your
    >> upgrades. Mom and Pop won't notice how bad it sucks.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
    >
    >Vista sp2 was a downgrade.
    >****in right clicking the desktop takes 7 seconds for a window to show up.
    >Friggen disgusting that a Windows OS behaves that way.
    >
    >I'd fire the lot of them.
    >
    >Disgraceful...POS<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

    SP2 increased network performance a bit IME (it was about 10x slower
    than XP before that; now it's just a little bit slower). It also made
    sleep/hibernate performance a little bit more reliable, although it's
    still only at about 75% reliable.

    I'm not familiar with the problem you cite and there have not been a
    lot of reports of it.
     

Share This Page