Off topic - maybe not

+Bob+ wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:59:18 -0700, "Drew" <Aylen1957@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
> <!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> I have to agree with the positive on this as myself and all my friends and
>> contacts also have been running Vista since day one with no stumbles,
>> crashes or anything negative.. The only thing I have done to this system is
>> switch from 32 bit to 64 bit and knew way ahead that I would need to do a
>> clean install.. The majority of problems people have had is due to inferior
>> equipment or inferior mentality. Which category do you fall in as it is one
>> or the other as there is no other possibilities!!!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
>
> Total BS. Take a look around the industry. See how many people have
> issue with Vista. See how many corporations refused to adopt Vista
> after an in-depth review (Corporations that consistently upgraded from
> one windows release to the next, sans Millennium, without exception).
>
> As for my equipment, it's new and certified for Vista. That doesn't
> make Vista any better, it just doesn't make it worse. The same goes
> for those major corporation I mentioned.
>
> As for mentality, I'm sure I beat you there - if only by having the
> intelligence not to make erroneous assumptions about other people.
> Likewise, many VERY talented people with serious Windows engineering
> and support skills, people with list of certifications, people who did
> robust testing, have advised their corporations/businesses not to
> adopt Vista (but for some reason, you, untrained, uncertified,
> unaccomplished, and sitting at your lone desktop, seem to know
> better). <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

FUKK!!! You only open your big, fat, pompous, arrogant, condescending
mouth to change your feet!

 

I should have expected a response such as this from you.. You who say just
because you are having problems and some others are having problems you
automatically assume that everyone is having these problems!! Your equipment
is so called vista certified which means diddly squat and you know it!! Many
many corporations were advised not to jump to xp when it first came out as
it was a buggy op system as all are when first introduced!!.. If you deny
that than once again you prove how feeble your argument really is.. I have
on purpose many times stressed this machine trying to cause it to crash just
so I could validate other arguments that it is a problem with vista.. It
simply will not do it, then again it is not a store bought system that
always has a weak point in it somewhere. As for the untrained or
unaccomplished well I run 4 different machines here at my home, 1 vista
business desktop, 1 vista home premium all in one desktop and 2 xp machines
1 laptop xp pro and 1 desktop xp home.. both xp machines are slow and buggy
as they have had so many patches and service packs they are bogged down
terribly also they are not as modern as the vista machines. Now unless you
personally know all the people and what equipment they run that are
currently having problems then you really do not have a winning argument
towards the negative as the proof that you should be reading in the
responses to your post. I speak from personal experience with the machines
that my friends run as I either built them or had them built for them.. Each
one is custom built with various processors, motherboards, graphics cards
and hard drives that are known to work well together.. The software that
they run is up to date and not something that was written in the dark ages
for let's say win 98. They do not load there computers down with CRAP like
mcafee or anything norton that are known to cause problems. They also
maintain there systems with good housekeeping which also helps prevent
problems. Now I was hoping to have or partake in a intelligent debate over
this post but obviously you have chosen not to so this is where one says
PLONK!! There's another one for the killfile!!

"+Bob+" <nomailplease@example.com> wrote in message
news:bd7l25lklo4og4tlvmepnehe07psmfcjch@4ax.com...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:59:18 -0700, "Drew" <Aylen1957@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
><!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>>I have to agree with the positive on this as myself and all my friends and
>>contacts also have been running Vista since day one with no stumbles,
>>crashes or anything negative.. The only thing I have done to this system
>>is
>>switch from 32 bit to 64 bit and knew way ahead that I would need to do a
>>clean install.. The majority of problems people have had is due to
>>inferior
>>equipment or inferior mentality. Which category do you fall in as it is
>>one
>>or the other as there is no other possibilities!!!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
>
> Total BS. Take a look around the industry. See how many people have
> issue with Vista. See how many corporations refused to adopt Vista
> after an in-depth review (Corporations that consistently upgraded from
> one windows release to the next, sans Millennium, without exception).
>
> As for my equipment, it's new and certified for Vista. That doesn't
> make Vista any better, it just doesn't make it worse. The same goes
> for those major corporation I mentioned.
>
> As for mentality, I'm sure I beat you there - if only by having the
> intelligence not to make erroneous assumptions about other people.
> Likewise, many VERY talented people with serious Windows engineering
> and support skills, people with list of certifications, people who did
> robust testing, have advised their corporations/businesses not to
> adopt Vista (but for some reason, you, untrained, uncertified,
> unaccomplished, and sitting at your lone desktop, seem to know
> better). <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

We're not sure HOW you used it.
I am a scientist/engineer and Vista is a prohibited piece of crapware that
is NOT allowed to be installe dhere anymore.
We downgraded to WindowsXP.

Vista is meant for kids, housewives and playful public who search for
videos, pictures and other bs that has nothing todo with busienss.

 

Ohh I just noticed it's the same Richard Urban!!

Don't pay attention to this MS-agent. He is here to promote an inferior
product that Vista is.
And now he's on a new misssion - to promote a FIX for Vista that Windows7
is.
Let's see if Windows8 fixes Windows7!

 

Oh! You're the guy who likes to thump his chest and say he am ENGINEER, and
smart too!

Manure!

--

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP
Windows Desktop Experience


"Mark Levitski" <SS@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:egRjGIu5JHA.2656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Ohh I just noticed it's the same Richard Urban!!
>
> Don't pay attention to this MS-agent. He is here to promote an inferior
> product that Vista is.
> And now he's on a new misssion - to promote a FIX for Vista that Windows7
> is.
> Let's see if Windows8 fixes Windows7! <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:42:48 -0700, "Drew" <Aylen1957@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>I should have expected a response such as this from you.. You who say just
>because you are having problems and some others are having problems you
>automatically assume that everyone is having these problems!! Your equipment
>is so called vista certified which means diddly squat and you know it!! Many
>many corporations were advised not to jump to xp when it first came out as
>it was a buggy op system as all are when first introduced!!.. If you deny
>that than once again you prove how feeble your argument really is.. I have
>on purpose many times stressed this machine trying to cause it to crash just
>so I could validate other arguments that it is a problem with vista.. It
>simply will not do it, then again it is not a store bought system that
>always has a weak point in it somewhere. As for the untrained or
>unaccomplished well I run 4 different machines here at my home, 1 vista
>business desktop, 1 vista home premium all in one desktop and 2 xp machines
>1 laptop xp pro and 1 desktop xp home.. both xp machines are slow and buggy
>as they have had so many patches and service packs they are bogged down
>terribly also they are not as modern as the vista machines. Now unless you
>personally know all the people and what equipment they run that are
>currently having problems then you really do not have a winning argument
>towards the negative as the proof that you should be reading in the
>responses to your post. I speak from personal experience with the machines
>that my friends run as I either built them or had them built for them.. Each
>one is custom built with various processors, motherboards, graphics cards
>and hard drives that are known to work well together.. The software that
>they run is up to date and not something that was written in the dark ages
>for let's say win 98. They do not load there computers down with CRAP like
>mcafee or anything norton that are known to cause problems. They also
>maintain there systems with good housekeeping which also helps prevent
>problems. Now I was hoping to have or partake in a intelligent debate over
>this post but obviously you have chosen not to so this is where one says
>PLONK!! There's another one for the killfile!!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->


I'm hardly a grammar freak, but you will need to repost this with
better sentence structure and some paragraph breaks if you expect
people to read it.

 

It was not meant for someone else.. You read it therefore my response is
complete!

"+Bob+" <nomailplease@example.com> wrote in message
news:q66m251lk7g157ra4vi5q54lauoukug4kk@4ax.com...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:42:48 -0700, "Drew" <Aylen1957@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
><!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>>I should have expected a response such as this from you.. You who say just
>>because you are having problems and some others are having problems you
>>automatically assume that everyone is having these problems!! Your
>>equipment
>>is so called vista certified which means diddly squat and you know it!!
>>Many
>>many corporations were advised not to jump to xp when it first came out as
>>it was a buggy op system as all are when first introduced!!.. If you deny
>>that than once again you prove how feeble your argument really is.. I have
>>on purpose many times stressed this machine trying to cause it to crash
>>just
>>so I could validate other arguments that it is a problem with vista.. It
>>simply will not do it, then again it is not a store bought system that
>>always has a weak point in it somewhere. As for the untrained or
>>unaccomplished well I run 4 different machines here at my home, 1 vista
>>business desktop, 1 vista home premium all in one desktop and 2 xp
>>machines
>>1 laptop xp pro and 1 desktop xp home.. both xp machines are slow and
>>buggy
>>as they have had so many patches and service packs they are bogged down
>>terribly also they are not as modern as the vista machines. Now unless you
>>personally know all the people and what equipment they run that are
>>currently having problems then you really do not have a winning argument
>>towards the negative as the proof that you should be reading in the
>>responses to your post. I speak from personal experience with the machines
>>that my friends run as I either built them or had them built for them..
>>Each
>>one is custom built with various processors, motherboards, graphics cards
>>and hard drives that are known to work well together.. The software that
>>they run is up to date and not something that was written in the dark ages
>>for let's say win 98. They do not load there computers down with CRAP like
>>mcafee or anything norton that are known to cause problems. They also
>>maintain there systems with good housekeeping which also helps prevent
>>problems. Now I was hoping to have or partake in a intelligent debate over
>>this post but obviously you have chosen not to so this is where one says
>>PLONK!! There's another one for the killfile!!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
>
>
> I'm hardly a grammar freak, but you will need to repost this with
> better sentence structure and some paragraph breaks if you expect
> people to read it.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 20:09:38 -0700, "Drew" <Aylen1957@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>It was not meant for someone else.. You read it therefore my response is
>complete!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

I skimmed it. It was too poorly written to spend time trying to
comprehend. Your loss... even more so if you write like that all the
time - Did you skip out on a couple classes in school? Or do you just
like to ignore everything they taught you?

 

You could try installing via dual-boot to see if any of your device vendors
need a friendly nudge. =)

--
Speaking for myself only.
See for some helpful WMP info.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--
"Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message
news:O%23WTf8%234JHA.1528@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Richard Urban wrote:<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> Windows 7 is going RTM in latter July. General availability is set for
>> October 22.
>>
>> If you are currently running Vista the upgrade is painless.
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
>
>
> The real question is: When will all of the hardware manufacturers have
> device drivers ready? Or will their lack of timely response plague Win7,
> as it did Vista?
>
>
> --
>
> Bruce Chambers
>
> Help us help you:
>
>
>
>
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin
>
> Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand
> Russell
>
> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
> killed a great many philosophers.
> ~ Denis Diderot <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->