1. Welcome Guest! In order to create a new topic or reply to an existing one, you must register first. It is easy and free. Click here to sign up now!.
    Dismiss Notice

New OS - better folder organisation this time?

Discussion in 'Windows Vista' started by Doug, Oct 18, 2009.

  1. Doug

    Doug Guest

    I started with Windows 95 and in those days I regarded the whole hard drive
    as mine to organise all folders any way I chose. Subsequent versions of
    Windows made certain folders such as (My) Documents "special" and I have
    only gone along with that partially, so that my stuff is stored haphazardly.
    For example with my current Vista Home Premium system I have a dozen
    websites I run stored in sub-folders of C:\webs, I still run DOS based
    MasterFile Professional from C:\MPRO, and I have numerous home-made icons in
    C:\IC.

    With the arrival of Windows 7 I want to do it better. With a twelve
    megapixel camera, photographs take up a disproportionate amount of room, and
    storing them (and backing them up) along with documents doesn't fit
    comfortably. There must be some really neat ways of organising stuff on hard
    drives. And keeping all data (and settings?) out of the installation drive
    (or partition anyway) seems attractive (I have two physical drives of 233GB
    each - I will probably replace each of them with 1TB). The danger is that,
    in my enthusiasm for getting Win 7 up and running, I will just copy folders
    into the same locations as before and muddle along as I have in the past. I
    would like to do better this time and would appreciate guidance as to how to
    approach this.

    At the moment I run scheduled backups of my whole C drive (apart from the
    few files in use) using Second Copy to my D drive daily. I also use Second
    Copy manually to backup to off-site mobile hard drives (Iomega eGo) weekly,
    encrypted in this case using open source TrueCrypt.

    Doug




    __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4518 (20091017) __________

    The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

     
  2. Jon

    Jon Guest

    "Doug" <doug@FAKEpleasereplytogroup.com> wrote in message
    news:%23ATtVv8TKHA.1280@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    >I started with Windows 95 and in those days I regarded the whole hard drive
    >as mine to organise all folders any way I chose.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->



    So why are you keen to give up this right? Afraid of the vast power that you
    wield over the hard drive?

    Neither Vista nor Windows 7 is about more power to the user. The trend is
    more power to the system, and a progressive dumbing down of the user to the
    point of zombified stupefaction. Future operating systems will no doubt
    continue this trend.

    First they came for your toolbar. Then they came for your taskbar. Next
    they'll come for your folders...




    Subsequent versions of<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > Windows made certain folders such as (My) Documents "special" and I have
    > only gone along with that partially, so that my stuff is stored
    > haphazardly. For example with my current Vista Home Premium system I have
    > a dozen websites I run stored in sub-folders of C:webs, I still run DOS
    > based MasterFile Professional from C:MPRO, and I have numerous home-made
    > icons in C:IC.
    >
    > With the arrival of Windows 7 I want to do it better.<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->



    A noble aim, but since doing things 'differently' and doing them 'better'
    are not synonymous, you'd need to define what you mean by 'better'.




    With a twelve<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > megapixel camera, photographs take up a disproportionate amount of room,
    > and storing them (and backing them up) along with documents doesn't fit
    > comfortably. There must be some really neat ways of organising stuff on
    > hard drives. And keeping all data (and settings?) out of the installation
    > drive (or partition anyway) seems attractive (I have two physical drives
    > of 233GB each - I will probably replace each of them with 1TB). The danger
    > is that, in my enthusiasm for getting Win 7 up and running, I will just
    > copy folders into the same locations as before and muddle along as I have
    > in the past. I would like to do better this time and would appreciate
    > guidance as to how to approach this.
    ><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->


    Your question seems to contain the solution ie putting your data on a
    separate partitions from your os, so I'm not sure what you're asking here.


    <!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
    > At the moment I run scheduled backups of my whole C drive (apart from the
    > few files in use) using Second Copy to my D drive daily. I also use Second
    > Copy manually to backup to off-site mobile hard drives (Iomega eGo)
    > weekly, encrypted in this case using open source TrueCrypt.
    >
    ><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->


    The need for backups is unlikely to be going away any time soon, while the
    potential for physical failure exists.




    --
    Jon
     

Share This Page