Hackers Exploiting Unpatched Windows Bug

FBonWin7RC1x64 wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> milt wrote:
>>> Planters wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Vista didn't have this problem you reported. This is a Vista NG not
>>>> XP. Or are you this stupid with reporting bad information that
>>>> doesn't apply.
>>>>
>>>> You always have an excuse, always, huh?
>>>
>>> No, he's just a troll, that's what trolls do. If he actually believes
>>> the crap he types? Who knows, but I do know he just does it to annoy
>>> people. I mean, why else would someone so ANTI-MS be IN a newsgroup
>>> for a MS OS?
>>
>> I'm on a noble and sacred mission to make the Internet safer by
>> helping people kick the Windows addiction, of course!
>>
>> Alias
> You are sick!

Yeah, he is like that Chuck57 nut that reported about what he and his
wife are doing. Like anyone cares?

 

Wayne wrote:
> <snip>
>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is no
>> reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>
>> Alias
>
> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop Linux
> distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally take care
> of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different take on this. "
> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>
> Wayne McGlinn
> Brisbane, Oz

Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows. If one
stays up to date with Ubuntu updates and only installs programs from the
repository, the chances of getting compromised are nil.

Alias

 

FBonWin7RC1x64 wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> milt wrote:
>>> Planters wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Vista didn't have this problem you reported. This is a Vista NG not
>>>> XP. Or are you this stupid with reporting bad information that
>>>> doesn't apply.
>>>>
>>>> You always have an excuse, always, huh?
>>>
>>> No, he's just a troll, that's what trolls do. If he actually believes
>>> the crap he types? Who knows, but I do know he just does it to annoy
>>> people. I mean, why else would someone so ANTI-MS be IN a newsgroup
>>> for a MS OS?
>>
>> I'm on a noble and sacred mission to make the Internet safer by
>> helping people kick the Windows addiction, of course!
>>
>> Alias
> You are sick!

No, Frank, you're one of the sickest and poorest excuse for a human
being I've ever encountered. You have no problem hurling disgusting lies
at those whom you perceive to be your enemies. In short, you have no
principles.

Alias

 

Alias wrote:
> Wayne wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is no
>>> reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop Linux
>> distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally take
>> care of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different take on
>> this. "
>> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>>
>> Wayne McGlinn
>> Brisbane, Oz
>
> Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows. If one
> stays up to date with Ubuntu updates and only installs programs from the
> repository, the chances of getting compromised are nil.
>
> Alias

Nothing is bulletproof as long as human beings are involved in it. When
human beings become super beings, you let everyone know. Linux is not
bulletproof and it will never be bulletproof.

 

Planters wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Wayne wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is no
>>>> reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop Linux
>>> distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally take
>>> care of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different take on
>>> this. "
>>> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>>>
>>> Wayne McGlinn
>>> Brisbane, Oz
>>
>> Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows. If one
>> stays up to date with Ubuntu updates and only installs programs from
>> the repository, the chances of getting compromised are nil.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Nothing is bulletproof as long as human beings are involved in it. When
> human beings become super beings, you let everyone know. Linux is not
> bulletproof and it will never be bulletproof.

Please read for content. I wrote, and I quote, "*compared* to Windows".
Also note that I wrote, and I quote, "If one stays up to date ..." How
long have you had a reading comprehension problem?

Alias

 

"Alias" <iamaliasNUK3@THISgmail.com> wrote in message
news:h00o3a$sqj$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9133648
>


Windows 7 p-p-p-propaganda

--
Jon

 

Alias wrote:
> Wayne wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is no
>>> reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop Linux
>> distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally take
>> care of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different take on
>> this. "
>> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>>
>> Wayne McGlinn
>> Brisbane, Oz
>
> Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows.

Properly setup, Windows Vista/7 are *BULLETPROOF*...PERIOD!

 

Alias wrote:
> Planters wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Wayne wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is no
>>>>> reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop
>>>> Linux distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally
>>>> take care of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different take
>>>> on this. "
>>>> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>>>>
>>>> Wayne McGlinn
>>>> Brisbane, Oz
>>>
>>> Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows. If one
>>> stays up to date with Ubuntu updates and only installs programs from
>>> the repository, the chances of getting compromised are nil.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> Nothing is bulletproof as long as human beings are involved in it.
>> When human beings become super beings, you let everyone know. Linux is
>> not bulletproof and it will never be bulletproof.
>
> Please read for content. I wrote, and I quote, "*compared* to Windows".
> Also note that I wrote, and I quote, "If one stays up to date ..." How
> long have you had a reading comprehension problem?
>
> Alias

More of your lies. Get lost linturd.

 

Alias wrote:
> Planters wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Wayne wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is no
>>>>> reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop
>>>> Linux distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally
>>>> take care of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different take
>>>> on this. "
>>>> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>>>>
>>>> Wayne McGlinn
>>>> Brisbane, Oz
>>>
>>> Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows. If one
>>> stays up to date with Ubuntu updates and only installs programs from
>>> the repository, the chances of getting compromised are nil.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> Nothing is bulletproof as long as human beings are involved in it.
>> When human beings become super beings, you let everyone know. Linux is
>> not bulletproof and it will never be bulletproof.
>
> Please read for content. I wrote, and I quote, "*compared* to Windows".
> Also note that I wrote, and I quote, "If one stays up to date ..." How
> long have you had a reading comprehension problem?
>
> Alias

Once again, you flipped it to fit your needs. Linux is not 'bulletproof'
so you shouldn't even mention the word 'bulletproof'. You take a gun,
point it at a machine running Linux, pull the trigger and see if it's
'bulletproof'.

 

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Planters wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> Wayne wrote:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is
>>>>>> no reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop
>>>>> Linux distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally
>>>>> take care of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different
>>>>> take on this. "
>>>>> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>>>>>
>>>>> Wayne McGlinn
>>>>> Brisbane, Oz
>>>>
>>>> Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows. If one
>>>> stays up to date with Ubuntu updates and only installs programs from
>>>> the repository, the chances of getting compromised are nil.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> Nothing is bulletproof as long as human beings are involved in it.
>>> When human beings become super beings, you let everyone know. Linux
>>> is not bulletproof and it will never be bulletproof.
>>
>> Please read for content. I wrote, and I quote, "*compared* to
>> Windows". Also note that I wrote, and I quote, "If one stays up to
>> date ..." How long have you had a reading comprehension problem?
>>
>> Alias
>
> More of your lies.

Not a lie.

> Get lost linturd.

Take your bedside manner somewhere else, troll.

Alias

 

Planters wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Planters wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> Wayne wrote:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is
>>>>>> no reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop
>>>>> Linux distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally
>>>>> take care of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different
>>>>> take on this. "
>>>>> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>>>>>
>>>>> Wayne McGlinn
>>>>> Brisbane, Oz
>>>>
>>>> Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows. If one
>>>> stays up to date with Ubuntu updates and only installs programs from
>>>> the repository, the chances of getting compromised are nil.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> Nothing is bulletproof as long as human beings are involved in it.
>>> When human beings become super beings, you let everyone know. Linux
>>> is not bulletproof and it will never be bulletproof.
>>
>> Please read for content. I wrote, and I quote, "*compared* to
>> Windows". Also note that I wrote, and I quote, "If one stays up to
>> date ..." How long have you had a reading comprehension problem?
>>
>> Alias
>
> Once again, you flipped it to fit your needs.

No, I explained it so a third grader could understand it.

> Linux is not 'bulletproof'

I didn't say it was.

> so you shouldn't even mention the word 'bulletproof'.

Failed English, did you?

> You take a gun,
> point it at a machine running Linux, pull the trigger and see if it's
> 'bulletproof'.

Yep, you have a reading comprehension problem.

Alias

 

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Wayne wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Your ill informed opinion. Ubuntu rocks on my desktops. There is no
>>>> reason for Windows on *anything* if you want a safer Net.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> "There is a common belief that if someone switches to a desktop Linux
>>> distribution such as Ubuntu, then security concerns generally take
>>> care of themselves. Unfortunately, reality has a different take on
>>> this. "
>>> http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6620/1/
>>>
>>> Wayne McGlinn
>>> Brisbane, Oz
>>
>> Properly set up, Ubuntu is *bulletproof* compared to Windows.
>
> Properly setup, Windows Vista/7 are *BULLETPROOF*...PERIOD!

And if you only visit safe sites and if you keep Windows updates up to
date along with your anti virus, anti malware, Java, Flash, Office, etc.
News flash: most people don't have a properly set up Windows any
version which is why 50,000 Windows computers are being infected by
Conficker A DAY. Course, if there's a new virus that the anti virus
programs haven't got a definition for yet, even big bad Frank will get
infected and not even know it.

Alias

 

Alias wrote:

> Yep, you have a reading comprehension problem.
>

What's wrong with you, you clown? Did you loose track of time on your
door-2-door Linux magazine sales route? You *clown* the whole incident
thing was four days ago.

What's wrong with you? <vbg>

 

Planters wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Yep, you have a reading comprehension problem.
>>
>
> What's wrong with you, you clown? Did you loose

I guess I better tighten it up a bit, then.

> track of time on your
> door-2-door Linux magazine sales route? You *clown* the whole incident
> thing was four days ago.

You still have a reading comprehension problem.

>
> What's wrong with you? <vbg>

I've been busy.

Alias

 

Alias wrote:
> Planters wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, you have a reading comprehension problem.
>>>
>>
>> What's wrong with you, you clown? Did you loose
>
> I guess I better tighten it up a bit, then.
>
>> track of time on your door-2-door Linux magazine sales route? You
>> *clown* the whole incident thing was four days ago.
>
> You still have a reading comprehension problem.
>
>>
>> What's wrong with you? <vbg>
>
> I've been busy.
>
Did wifie #4 bail you out of jail...again?...LOL!

 

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Planters wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yep, you have a reading comprehension problem.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What's wrong with you, you clown? Did you loose
>>
>> I guess I better tighten it up a bit, then.
>>
>>> track of time on your door-2-door Linux magazine sales route? You
>>> *clown* the whole incident thing was four days ago.
>>
>> You still have a reading comprehension problem.
>>
>>>
>>> What's wrong with you? <vbg>
>>
>> I've been busy.
>>
> Did wifie #4 bail you out of jail...again?...LOL!

Do you really think your stupid ans quite transparent lies are funny?

Alias

 

Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Planters wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yep, you have a reading comprehension problem.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What's wrong with you, you clown? Did you loose
>>>
>>> I guess I better tighten it up a bit, then.
>>>
>>>> track of time on your door-2-door Linux magazine sales route? You
>>>> *clown* the whole incident thing was four days ago.
>>>
>>> You still have a reading comprehension problem.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> What's wrong with you? <vbg>
>>>
>>> I've been busy.
>>>
>> Did wifie #4 bail you out of jail...again?...LOL!
>
> Do you really think your stupid ans quite transparent lies are funny?
>
> Alias

hehehe...she did, didn't she!...LOL!

 

Alias wrote:
>> What's wrong with you? <vbg>
>
> I've been busy.

What you were having someone sign you out of the asylum? It's another
week of you being loose on society, again.

 

Planters wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>>> What's wrong with you? <vbg>
>>
>> I've been busy.
>
> What you were having someone sign you out of the asylum? It's another
> week of you being loose on society, again.

Yawn, more moronic lies. If you must know, we moved our offices due to
expansion.

Alias

 

Alias wrote:
> Planters wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>>> What's wrong with you? <vbg>
>>>
>>> I've been busy.
>>
>> What you were having someone sign you out of the asylum? It's another
>> week of you being loose on society, again.
>
> Yawn, more moronic lies. If you must know, we moved our offices due to
> expansion.
>
> Alias

hehehe...so you got evicted cause you're broke huh?
Figures!