1. Welcome Guest! In order to create a new topic or reply to an existing one, you must register first. It is easy and free. Click here to sign up now!.
    Dismiss Notice

Why Big Brother is good for you

Discussion in 'Microsoft News' started by NewsBot, Apr 15, 2008.

  1. NewsBot

    NewsBot I Got News

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,813
    Operating System:
    Windows Vista Home Premium
    It* is now a pretty common thing to monitor staff by using GPS to determine where a company car is for instance. Taxi firms use it to pin point the location of their fleet at any given moment. This is a serious weapon for scheduling scenarios.

    Serious Criminals (Felons) are now tagged so Law Enforcement agencies can determine their location at any moment. Yes, it does not always work, but that is not the point I’m trying to make. The most recent and unfortunate child abduction cases here in the UK are either that of or . Both have been big stories, child abduction sadly does occur and must be utterly traumatic for all those involved.

    What is the problem with tagging children <i>by law </i>up till the age of let’s say five, at that age a chip is removed from them? I am not a parent and can only see advantages to this, and feel that this is surely inevitable. If the government is considering taxing cars (road tax) by using this technology, surely it’s just a matter of time till this is available for children.

    There are already things like
    available to monitor children and no-one seems to be making any objections, what do you think?





     

Share This Page