1. Welcome Guest! In order to create a new topic or reply to an existing one, you must register first. It is easy and free. Click here to sign up now!.
    Dismiss Notice

Server?

Discussion in 'Windows Home Server' started by Matthew, Apr 22, 2009.

  1. Matthew

    Matthew Guest

    This is probably going to amount to a silly question, but I'm curious
    about something.

    We are looking at Windows 2008 Enterprise Server and plan on running
    four instances of it under ESX. Since, as I understand it, I can
    legally run four virtual instances from one Enterprise license I planned
    to create a Domain Controller, SQL Server, and a Terminal Server. I
    also need a File/Print server and a Web Server for intranet use only.

    I'm curious if it's a good idea or bad idea to run a web server on a
    file and print server?
     
  2. Hello Mathew,

    Not a bad idea, but will your webserver be an intranet or it will be
    available to people outside on the internet, and also you want to check the
    traffic that this webserver will be generating.. And if your webserver is
    going to be access on the internet, then you want to look into security
    issues for youe files etc..

    --
    Isaac Oben [MCTIP:EA, MCSE]
    "Matthew" <"system[spam]tyrant"@gmail[dot].com> wrote in message
    news:OmX$kQ2wJHA.2140@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
    > This is probably going to amount to a silly question, but I'm curious
    > about something.
    >
    > We are looking at Windows 2008 Enterprise Server and plan on running four
    > instances of it under ESX. Since, as I understand it, I can legally run
    > four virtual instances from one Enterprise license I planned to create a
    > Domain Controller, SQL Server, and a Terminal Server. I also need a
    > File/Print server and a Web Server for intranet use only.
    >
    > I'm curious if it's a good idea or bad idea to run a web server on a file
    > and print server?
     
  3. Matthew

    Matthew Guest

    It won't be accessed via the internet. It's for internal use only. The
    only thing I can think of that it will do is besides the internal web
    application stuff is WSUS.
     
  4. Hello Mathew,

    If it is internal only, then I don't think it is a bad idea..

    --
    Isaac Oben [MCTIP:EA, MCSE]
    "Matthew" <"system[spam]tyrant"@gmail[dot].com> wrote in message
    news:udFhAw2wJHA.5684@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
    > It won't be accessed via the internet. It's for internal use only. The
    > only thing I can think of that it will do is besides the internal web
    > application stuff is WSUS.
     
  5. Matthew

    Matthew Guest

    Isaac Oben [MCITP,MCSE] wrote:
    > Hello Mathew,
    >
    > If it is internal only, then I don't think it is a bad idea..
    >


    Cool. I couldn't imagine why it would be, but thought I'd ask here first.
     
  6. Hello matthew,

    Also keep this in mind:
    http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;897615

    Best regards

    Meinolf Weber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
    no rights.
    ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
    ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


    > This is probably going to amount to a silly question, but I'm curious
    > about something.
    >
    > We are looking at Windows 2008 Enterprise Server and plan on running
    > four instances of it under ESX. Since, as I understand it, I can
    > legally run four virtual instances from one Enterprise license I
    > planned to create a Domain Controller, SQL Server, and a Terminal
    > Server. I also need a File/Print server and a Web Server for intranet
    > use only.
    >
    > I'm curious if it's a good idea or bad idea to run a web server on a
    > file and print server?
    >
     
  7. Matthew

    Matthew Guest

    That's just saying they don't support any third party virtualization
    programs right? I mean I can still run Windows under VMware without
    violating their virtualization license correct?
     
  8. Hello matthew,

    Has nothing to do with the license itself, it is about support.

    Best regards

    Meinolf Weber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
    no rights.
    ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
    ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


    > That's just saying they don't support any third party virtualization
    > programs right? I mean I can still run Windows under VMware without
    > violating their virtualization license correct?
    >
     

Share This Page