Java works on 64-bit IE but not on 32-bit IE...

Hey folks,

Have a strange issue with my Java install.

My users access the server thru a terminal session.

The server is Windows 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition.

For some reason, when my Domain Users go to a site that requires Java using
the 32-bit IE the JavaScript will not work. When they go to that same site
with the 64-bit IE then the JavaScript works just fine.

When I log in with a Domain Admin account, then the JavaScript run perfectly
on both the 32 and 64-bit IE.

I have installed both the 32 and 64-bit versions of Java on the server
because I understand that both need to be there if users are going to use
both versions of IE.

So in short, my question is....how would I fix this? Since Domain Users
don't have access and Domain Admins do, is this some sort of permissions
issue? Java folder permission?

Any help would be appreciated!

 

[[ Forwarded to Windows Server Security & General and Win 64bit General via
crosspost ]]

GuidanceCenterSysop wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Hey folks,
>
> Have a strange issue with my Java install.
>
> My users access the server thru a terminal session.
>
> The server is Windows 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition.
>
> For some reason, when my Domain Users go to a site that requires Java
> using
> the 32-bit IE the JavaScript will not work. When they go to that same
> site
> with the 64-bit IE then the JavaScript works just fine.
>
> When I log in with a Domain Admin account, then the JavaScript run
> perfectly
> on both the 32 and 64-bit IE.
>
> I have installed both the 32 and 64-bit versions of Java on the server
> because I understand that both need to be there if users are going to use
> both versions of IE.
>
> So in short, my question is....how would I fix this? Since Domain Users
> don't have access and Domain Admins do, is this some sort of permissions
> issue? Java folder permission?
>
> Any help would be appreciated! <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

I have found the same thing with Windows 7. IE 64 works with java but not IE
32bit.

Peter Banks


"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e2DnmZNAKHA.4608@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>
> [[ Forwarded to Windows Server Security & General and Win 64bit General
> via crosspost ]]
>
> GuidanceCenterSysop wrote:<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> Have a strange issue with my Java install.
>>
>> My users access the server thru a terminal session.
>>
>> The server is Windows 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition.
>>
>> For some reason, when my Domain Users go to a site that requires Java
>> using
>> the 32-bit IE the JavaScript will not work. When they go to that same
>> site
>> with the 64-bit IE then the JavaScript works just fine.
>>
>> When I log in with a Domain Admin account, then the JavaScript run
>> perfectly
>> on both the 32 and 64-bit IE.
>>
>> I have installed both the 32 and 64-bit versions of Java on the server
>> because I understand that both need to be there if users are going to use
>> both versions of IE.
>>
>> So in short, my question is....how would I fix this? Since Domain Users
>> don't have access and Domain Admins do, is this some sort of permissions
>> issue? Java folder permission?
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

I have both editions of Java on my Win 7 x64 system and there is no
problem with Java working in either one of them. One of the examples is
the NOAA weather maps. You can display either a single radar picture or
you can select to loop the past hour. The loop is a java function and
it works on both 32-bit & 64-bit editions of both IE8 and Firefox - no
problems!



PJB wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> I have found the same thing with Windows 7. IE 64 works with java but not IE
> 32bit.
>
> Peter Banks
>
>
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e2DnmZNAKHA.4608@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> [[ Forwarded to Windows Server Security & General and Win 64bit General
>> via crosspost ]]
>>
>> GuidanceCenterSysop wrote:<!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> Have a strange issue with my Java install.
>>>
>>> My users access the server thru a terminal session.
>>>
>>> The server is Windows 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition.
>>>
>>> For some reason, when my Domain Users go to a site that requires Java
>>> using
>>> the 32-bit IE the JavaScript will not work. When they go to that same
>>> site
>>> with the 64-bit IE then the JavaScript works just fine.
>>>
>>> When I log in with a Domain Admin account, then the JavaScript run
>>> perfectly
>>> on both the 32 and 64-bit IE.
>>>
>>> I have installed both the 32 and 64-bit versions of Java on the server
>>> because I understand that both need to be there if users are going to use
>>> both versions of IE.
>>>
>>> So in short, my question is....how would I fix this? Since Domain Users
>>> don't have access and Domain Admins do, is this some sort of permissions
>>> issue? Java folder permission?
>>>
>>> Any help would be appreciated!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc--><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
>
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Bobby,
In case of doubt, this is Sun's official Java test page:

Carlos

"Bobby Johnson" wrote:
<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> I have both editions of Java on my Win 7 x64 system and there is no
> problem with Java working in either one of them. One of the examples is
> the NOAA weather maps. You can display either a single radar picture or
> you can select to loop the past hour. The loop is a java function and
> it works on both 32-bit & 64-bit editions of both IE8 and Firefox - no
> problems!
>
>
>
> PJB wrote:<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
> > I have found the same thing with Windows 7. IE 64 works with java but not IE
> > 32bit.
> >
> > Peter Banks
> >
> >
> > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:e2DnmZNAKHA.4608@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...<!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
> >> [[ Forwarded to Windows Server Security & General and Win 64bit General
> >> via crosspost ]]
> >>
> >> GuidanceCenterSysop wrote:
> >>> Hey folks,
> >>>
> >>> Have a strange issue with my Java install.
> >>>
> >>> My users access the server thru a terminal session.
> >>>
> >>> The server is Windows 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition.
> >>>
> >>> For some reason, when my Domain Users go to a site that requires Java
> >>> using
> >>> the 32-bit IE the JavaScript will not work. When they go to that same
> >>> site
> >>> with the 64-bit IE then the JavaScript works just fine.
> >>>
> >>> When I log in with a Domain Admin account, then the JavaScript run
> >>> perfectly
> >>> on both the 32 and 64-bit IE.
> >>>
> >>> I have installed both the 32 and 64-bit versions of Java on the server
> >>> because I understand that both need to be there if users are going to use
> >>> both versions of IE.
> >>>
> >>> So in short, my question is....how would I fix this? Since Domain Users
> >>> don't have access and Domain Admins do, is this some sort of permissions
> >>> issue? Java folder permission?
> >>>
> >>> Any help would be appreciated!<!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> >
> > <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Carlos,
For a second confirmation that Java does work in Windows 7 x64 in both
32-bit & 64-bit in both IE* 32-bit & 64-bit and Firefox 32-bit & 64-bit
I went to your link and it tells me that all four browsers have Java
functioning properly.

I also am able to loop my local weather radar, which is a Java app, in
both 32-bit & 64-bit.

Thanks,

Bobby

Carlos wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby,
> In case of doubt, this is Sun's official Java test page:
>
> Carlos
>
> "Bobby Johnson" wrote:
> <!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> I have both editions of Java on my Win 7 x64 system and there is no
>> problem with Java working in either one of them. One of the examples is
>> the NOAA weather maps. You can display either a single radar picture or
>> you can select to loop the past hour. The loop is a java function and
>> it works on both 32-bit & 64-bit editions of both IE8 and Firefox - no
>> problems!
>>
>>
>>
>> PJB wrote:<!--coloro:darkred--><span style="color:darkred <!--/coloro-->
>>> I have found the same thing with Windows 7. IE 64 works with java but not IE
>>> 32bit.
>>>
>>> Peter Banks
>>>
>>>
>>> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e2DnmZNAKHA.4608@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> [[ Forwarded to Windows Server Security & General and Win 64bit General
>>>> via crosspost ]]
>>>>
>>>> GuidanceCenterSysop wrote:
>>>>> Hey folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a strange issue with my Java install.
>>>>>
>>>>> My users access the server thru a terminal session.
>>>>>
>>>>> The server is Windows 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition.
>>>>>
>>>>> For some reason, when my Domain Users go to a site that requires Java
>>>>> using
>>>>> the 32-bit IE the JavaScript will not work. When they go to that same
>>>>> site
>>>>> with the 64-bit IE then the JavaScript works just fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I log in with a Domain Admin account, then the JavaScript run
>>>>> perfectly
>>>>> on both the 32 and 64-bit IE.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have installed both the 32 and 64-bit versions of Java on the server
>>>>> because I understand that both need to be there if users are going to use
>>>>> both versions of IE.
>>>>>
>>>>> So in short, my question is....how would I fix this? Since Domain Users
>>>>> don't have access and Domain Admins do, is this some sort of permissions
>>>>> issue? Java folder permission?
>>>>>
>>>>> Any help would be appreciated!
>>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc--><!--colorc--><!--/colorc--><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>
> I have both editions of Java on my Win 7 x64 system and there is no
> problem with Java working in either one of them. One of the examples is
> the NOAA weather maps. You can display either a single radar picture or
> you can select to loop the past hour. The loop is a java function and
> it works on both 32-bit & 64-bit editions of both IE8 and Firefox - no
> problems!
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
I am afraid you probably mix java and javascripts.
Javascripts are known to allow such animations, no need for java here.

Furthermore, I intentionally left javascript in my FF allowed,
but I denied using java.
Then I went to NOAA to see so radar namimations.
As expected, animations worked, based on javascripts, not on java.
Java for it is a cannon for sparrows.

--
Poutnik
The best depends on how the best is defined.

 

If you don't have Java, then you won't play javascripts.

Just as if you don't have an operating system on your computer, you
won't run any programs!



What is Java?

Java allows you to play online games, chat with people around the world,
calculate your mortgage interest, and view images in 3D, just to name a
few. It's also integral to the intranet applications and other
e-business solutions that are the foundation of corporate computing.


Poutnik wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> I have both editions of Java on my Win 7 x64 system and there is no
>> problem with Java working in either one of them. One of the examples is
>> the NOAA weather maps. You can display either a single radar picture or
>> you can select to loop the past hour. The loop is a java function and
>> it works on both 32-bit & 64-bit editions of both IE8 and Firefox - no
>> problems!
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> I am afraid you probably mix java and javascripts.
> Javascripts are known to allow such animations, no need for java here.
>
> Furthermore, I intentionally left javascript in my FF allowed,
> but I denied using java.
> Then I went to NOAA to see so radar namimations.
> As expected, animations worked, based on javascripts, not on java.
> Java for it is a cannon for sparrows.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>
> If you don't have Java, then you won't play javascripts.
>
> Just as if you don't have an operating system on your computer, you
> won't run any programs!
>
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
So, then you will be probably surprised
that java and javascript have not much common
but similar name and source code syntax.

Internet browsers or windows scripting hosts
do not need java installed, not even are using java.

Javascript are definitely not scripts written for java,
but web scriting language invented by Netscape AFAIK.

(Sun) Java is running java applets,
platform independent intermediate code,
what is partly compiled, partly interpreted.

--
Poutnik
The best depends on how the best is defined.

 

Obviously you are totally oblivious to what is plainly posted on the Sun
Java web site. Java is a Language Environment which runs Java scripts.

Read

and then tell Sun they don't know what they're talking about!

I'm surprised that you could dream up such garbage! I can guarantee
that your web browser will NOT execute any Java applications, also known
as scripts, if you don't have the Java Runtime Environment installed on
your computer.

Wake up and smell the coffee!



Poutnik wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> If you don't have Java, then you won't play javascripts.
>>
>> Just as if you don't have an operating system on your computer, you
>> won't run any programs!
>>
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> So, then you will be probably surprised
> that java and javascript have not much common
> but similar name and source code syntax.
>
> Internet browsers or windows scripting hosts
> do not need java installed, not even are using java.
>
> Javascript are definitely not scripts written for java,
> but web scriting language invented by Netscape AFAIK.
>
> (Sun) Java is running java applets,
> platform independent intermediate code,
> what is partly compiled, partly interpreted.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

See also:


It explains what a browser plug-in is.

Poutnik wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> If you don't have Java, then you won't play javascripts.
>>
>> Just as if you don't have an operating system on your computer, you
>> won't run any programs!
>>
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> So, then you will be probably surprised
> that java and javascript have not much common
> but similar name and source code syntax.
>
> Internet browsers or windows scripting hosts
> do not need java installed, not even are using java.
>
> Javascript are definitely not scripts written for java,
> but web scriting language invented by Netscape AFAIK.
>
> (Sun) Java is running java applets,
> platform independent intermediate code,
> what is partly compiled, partly interpreted.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Go to:


You will notice that for the radar images to cycle through Java is
started. If you don't have Java on you computer it will tell you that
you need to install Java.

Poutnik wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> I have both editions of Java on my Win 7 x64 system and there is no
>> problem with Java working in either one of them. One of the examples is
>> the NOAA weather maps. You can display either a single radar picture or
>> you can select to loop the past hour. The loop is a java function and
>> it works on both 32-bit & 64-bit editions of both IE8 and Firefox - no
>> problems!
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> I am afraid you probably mix java and javascripts.
> Javascripts are known to allow such animations, no need for java here.
>
> Furthermore, I intentionally left javascript in my FF allowed,
> but I denied using java.
> Then I went to NOAA to see so radar namimations.
> As expected, animations worked, based on javascripts, not on java.
> Java for it is a cannon for sparrows.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>
> Obviously you are totally oblivious to what is plainly posted on the Sun
> Java web site. Java is a Language Environment which runs Java scripts.
>
> Read
>
> and then tell Sun they don't know what they're talking about!
>
> I'm surprised that you could dream up such garbage! I can guarantee
> that your web browser will NOT execute any Java applications, also known
> as scripts, if you don't have the Java Runtime Environment installed on
> your computer.
>
> Wake up and smell the coffee!
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
I will tell it not to Sun, but to you..
If you read it carefully, in page you mentioned
there is no info about scripts of any kind.
( java do not user scripts ).

Mixing Java and Javascript is very common mistake.

See Java vs. JavaScript


Javascript does not need nor use java enviroment,
and even, if hosted in WSH, do not need even a browser.

Javascripts has nothing in common with Sun company.

Now, it is your turn for waking up.

In case of other offense I will realize
I need spend time by something more useful.

--
Poutnik
The best depends on how the best is defined.

 

Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>
> Go to:
>
>
> You will notice that for the radar images to cycle through Java is
> started. If you don't have Java on you computer it will tell you that
> you need to install Java.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

Yes, I see, this one is running java applet, not javascript.
It is clear you need java for it.

I was watching other animation on the site,
that was managed by javascripts.
For them, you do not need java.

--
Poutnik
The best depends on how the best is defined.

 

You are the one that injected the 'javascript' into the conversation,
not me! So you are the one that caused the confusion!

Poutnik wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> I have both editions of Java on my Win 7 x64 system and there is no
>> problem with Java working in either one of them. One of the examples is
>> the NOAA weather maps. You can display either a single radar picture or
>> you can select to loop the past hour. The loop is a java function and
>> it works on both 32-bit & 64-bit editions of both IE8 and Firefox - no
>> problems!
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> I am afraid you probably mix java and javascripts.
> Javascripts are known to allow such animations, no need for java here.
>
> Furthermore, I intentionally left javascript in my FF allowed,
> but I denied using java.
> Then I went to NOAA to see so radar namimations.
> As expected, animations worked, based on javascripts, not on java.
> Java for it is a cannon for sparrows.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

You should never have injected 'javascript' into the conversation to
start with!

Poutnik wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> Obviously you are totally oblivious to what is plainly posted on the Sun
>> Java web site. Java is a Language Environment which runs Java scripts.
>>
>> Read
>>
>> and then tell Sun they don't know what they're talking about!
>>
>> I'm surprised that you could dream up such garbage! I can guarantee
>> that your web browser will NOT execute any Java applications, also known
>> as scripts, if you don't have the Java Runtime Environment installed on
>> your computer.
>>
>> Wake up and smell the coffee!
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> I will tell it not to Sun, but to you..
> If you read it carefully, in page you mentioned
> there is no info about scripts of any kind.
> ( java do not user scripts ).
>
> Mixing Java and Javascript is very common mistake.
>
> See Java vs. JavaScript
>
>
> Javascript does not need nor use java enviroment,
> and even, if hosted in WSH, do not need even a browser.
>
> Javascripts has nothing in common with Sun company.
>
> Now, it is your turn for waking up.
>
> In case of other offense I will realize
> I need spend time by something more useful.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Check back through the posts and you will find that you were the first
one to mention 'javascript' not me! I said the radar loop and the Java
sight confirmed I had Java on my computer. I never mentioned the word
'javascript' before you injected it!


Poutnik wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> Go to:
>>
>>
>> You will notice that for the radar images to cycle through Java is
>> started. If you don't have Java on you computer it will tell you that
>> you need to install Java.
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
>
> Yes, I see, this one is running java applet, not javascript.
> It is clear you need java for it.
>
> I was watching other animation on the site,
> that was managed by javascripts.
> For them, you do not need java.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>
> You are the one that injected the 'javascript' into the conversation,
> not me! So you are the one that caused the confusion!
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
Your knowledge level started confusion, not me.

BTW, why to use so many replies for the same objection ?

You could spend one of them to confess,
that now you know the java vs javascript difference.

--
Poutnik
The best depends on how the best is defined.

 

And you should never have injected 'javascript' into the conversation.
I didn't even think of 'javascript' until you brought it up and then you
were totally off base with what you said. All I said was I have both
32-bit & 64-bit Java installed and that all four versions of my browser
would run Java apps.



Poutnik wrote:<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
> Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green <!--/coloro-->
>> You are the one that injected the 'javascript' into the conversation,
>> not me! So you are the one that caused the confusion!
>><!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
> Your knowledge level started confusion, not me.
>
> BTW, why to use so many replies for the same objection ?
>
> You could spend one of them to confess,
> that now you know the java vs javascript difference.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->

 

Bobby Johnson's previous post was like this :<!--coloro:blue--><span style="color:blue <!--/coloro-->
>
> And you should never have injected 'javascript' into the conversation.
> I didn't even think of 'javascript' until you brought it up and then you
> were totally off base with what you said. All I said was I have both
> 32-bit & 64-bit Java installed and that all four versions of my browser
> would run Java apps.
> <!--colorc--><!--/colorc-->
I have never thought javascript is so rude word,
otherwise I would not use it.

Why is so difficult for you to accept
you were wrong about javascript ?
And why to cover it by my injection ?
Because of revealing your prior confusion ?
Now you are not confused anymore.

For me it is easy to to say I was wrong, when I was.

I was wrong in expectation you could think
javascript is java in your radar link, because people do it often.

But, I was right you was confused about java and javascript
in general before I came with injection.

--
Poutnik
The best depends on how the best is defined.