1. Welcome Guest! In order to create a new topic or reply to an existing one, you must register first. It is easy and free. Click here to sign up now!.
    Dismiss Notice

Re: Installing Windows 7 on NTFS 1.2

Discussion in 'Windows Vista' started by Spacey Spade, May 30, 2009.

  1. Spacey Spade

    Spacey Spade Guest

    On Sun, 24 May 2009 08:26:40 -0400, Richard Urban wrote:

    > I don't know about others but I always use the file system version that is
    > included with the operating system. Some of the improvements and new
    > features just may be dependent upon having it present. This means a delete
    > partition, create partition and format partition.
    >
    > Two/three weeks down the road, when you have problems, would you even
    > consider the fact that an older version of the file system may be the
    > culprit - seeing as how it worked fine for that short period of time?


    This would be an attempt to reclaim control of the file system. Windows 7
    is the next evolution in taking control of your system away from you.
    Being that this is one of the new "features", then I hope it malfunctions.
     
  2. IT's THEIR file system and has been ever since they designed it into NT 3.
    They are not reclaiming recontrol of anything fool.

    --

    Richard Urban
    Microsoft MVP
    Windows Desktop Experience


    "Spacey Spade" <spaceygum@hotpop.com> wrote in message
    news:1bmb7pggwi4do.1a1bah4c5i3m3.dlg@40tude.net...
    > On Sun, 24 May 2009 08:26:40 -0400, Richard Urban wrote:
    >
    >> I don't know about others but I always use the file system version that
    >> is
    >> included with the operating system. Some of the improvements and new
    >> features just may be dependent upon having it present. This means a
    >> delete
    >> partition, create partition and format partition.
    >>
    >> Two/three weeks down the road, when you have problems, would you even
    >> consider the fact that an older version of the file system may be the
    >> culprit - seeing as how it worked fine for that short period of time?

    >
    > This would be an attempt to reclaim control of the file system. Windows 7
    > is the next evolution in taking control of your system away from you.
    > Being that this is one of the new "features", then I hope it malfunctions.
     
  3. Spacey Spade

    Spacey Spade Guest

    On Sat, 30 May 2009 09:14:16 -0400, Richard Urban wrote:
    > "Spacey Spade" <spaceygum@hotpop.com> wrote in message
    > news:1bmb7pggwi4do.1a1bah4c5i3m3.dlg@40tude.net...
    >> On Sun, 24 May 2009 08:26:40 -0400, Richard Urban wrote:
    >>
    >>> I don't know about others but I always use the file system version that
    >>> is
    >>> included with the operating system. Some of the improvements and new
    >>> features just may be dependent upon having it present. This means a
    >>> delete
    >>> partition, create partition and format partition.
    >>>
    >>> Two/three weeks down the road, when you have problems, would you even
    >>> consider the fact that an older version of the file system may be the
    >>> culprit - seeing as how it worked fine for that short period of time?

    >>
    >> This would be an attempt to reclaim control of the file system. Windows 7
    >> is the next evolution in taking control of your system away from you.
    >> Being that this is one of the new "features", then I hope it malfunctions.

    >
    > IT's THEIR file system and has been ever since they designed it into NT 3.
    > They are not reclaiming recontrol of anything fool.
    >
    > Richard Urban
    > Microsoft MVP
    > Windows Desktop Experience


    I wrote:
    >> This would be an attempt to reclaim control of the file system.

    And that means exactly what it means. To regain control of the file
    system, from micro$oft. Because you are right, they have control, and they
    can store whatever they want on it, without your consent.
     

Share This Page